While today many scientific articles present a simple process of editing one or more genes, gene editing with other technologies presented major technical challenges before CRISPR-based guide RNA (gRNA) technology. CRISPR has made advancements in academic research far more accessible due to the use of a simple gRNA system for gene targeting as opposed to the intense protein engineering required with older technologies (i.e. TALENs and ZFNs).
However, CRISPR/Cas9 implementation has proven more difficult for commercial product development due to lack of clear intellectual property (IP) freedom to operate (FTO) and licensing complexity.
In preparation for the development of CRISPR-edited products such as crops, yeasts and cell lines, many companies began the process of confirming access to commercial freedom-to-operate (FTO), but experienced challenges from the outset.
Many questions remain about the true patent holders for “foundational” CRISPR/Cas9, its various applications, how to access the IP, and even in which countries different patent holders hold rights. The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard (“the Broad”); and the University of California (UC), the University of Vienna, and CRISPR pioneer and Nobel co-laureate Emmanuelle Charpentier, PhD (collectively known as “CVC”) – are the two primary groups who claim rights to core CRISPR/Cas9 IP.
It is not an easy process for independent companies and other potential users to navigate commercial use. In early 2022, the United States Patent, Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a judgment in favor of the Broad. However, due to other patent complications, CVC maintains rights for compositions and uses of CRISPR/Cas9 – and may have the upper hand in Europe and elsewhere. CVC also may appeal the PTAB decision. To further complicate matters both the Broad and CVC have out-licensed their IP to companies for sub-licensing in different fields of use.
-Heidi Ledford, Nature Magazine 2022
The bottom line: for commercial use of foundational CRISPR/Cas9, multiple licenses with potentially burdensome terms may need to be identified, negotiated and maintained.
As efforts to obtain proprietary licensure increased, the tensions between all stakeholders became more apparent. While patent attorneys argued, scientists began introducing more enhanced versions of the original CRISPR based technology.
Cas-CLOVER, a dimeric targeted nuclease system, was first invented at Demeetra’s parent company Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals in 2015. The patents and applications are now held by Poseida Therapeutics, a spin-out of Transposagen. Clo051, the dimeric nuclease that cuts the genome was invented in 2011 at the Helmholtz-Zentrum München. Both sets of IP are licensed exclusively to Demeetra for agriculture and cell and microbial bioprocessing. The beauty of the system lies in its ability to target the gene(s) of interest through multiple mechanisms, such as different compositions of gRNAs and evolved inactivated Cas proteins. Clo051 is fused to the target binder in a dual approach (see below figure 1) to complete genomic cleavage. Cas-CLOVER differentiates from the foundational CRISPR/Cas9 system in many aspects – including Clo051’s cleavage, which results in very different insertions and deletions (INDELs) than Cas9 and higher specificity.
Clo051, a dimeric Clostridium derived type IIs restriction endonuclease
Cas-CLOVER offers commercial use in a single simple license, maintains the ease of design and implementation and offers the ability to avoid unwanted off-target mutations commonly generated in using CRISPR-Cas9. The frustrations of being unable to readily license CRISPR fueled a decade of new discoveries. Cas-CLOVER has already been validated in dozens of cell lines, including commercially important suspension CHO and HEK293 cells for bioproduction of biologics. Tobacco and other crops as well as yeast have been successfully edited with Cas-CLOVER.
The constraints placed by organizations that govern CRISPR/Cas9 licensing have forced many researchers to look to other solutions entirely. Our Cas-CLOVER technology, which edits genes more precisely than CRISPR, is covered by patents that are distinct from those of CRISPR, so our commercial users can wield greater freedom.
We look forward to creating more opportunities with our streamlined and easy to evaluate and license biotechnology.
Contact us to see how our licensing would look for you.